“You Will Be Found in 50 Pieces”: UP Governor’s Controversial Remarks on Live-In Relationships
- Lerin Astro
- Oct 9, 2025
- 2 min read

Uttar Pradesh Governor Anandiben Patel has once again sparked controversy with her remarks on live-in relationships, issuing a stark warning to women:
“Live-in relationships may be in vogue right now, but don’t do it… you will be found in 50 pieces.”
Remarks at Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith
Addressing the 47th convocation ceremony of Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith in Varanasi, Patel, who also serves as chancellor of state universities, expressed concern over rising instances of violence against women. She urged women students to make careful decisions about their personal lives and avoid circumstances that could lead to exploitation.
She stated:
“I have just one message for our daughters: make your own decisions about your life. You’ve seen what happens -- found in 50 pieces. Over the past 10 days, I’ve been receiving reports about such cases, and every time I see them, it pains me to wonder why our daughters make these choices.”
Previous Controversial Statement
The Governor’s latest warning comes a day after she suggested that orphanages reflect the consequences of live-in relationships, saying:
“Fifteen to 20-year-old girls are standing in line, each with a one-year-old child.”
She argued that men lure young women into hotels, have children, and then abandon them, describing such actions as contrary to societal values.
Advocacy for Awareness
Patel emphasized the need for educational institutions to raise awareness about the risks of live-in relationships. Referring to the POCSO Act, she mentioned meeting girls affected by exploitation, each with a disturbing and unique story, and highlighted the importance of preventive education.
The Governor also advised women to focus on noble goals rather than falling prey to such relationships, framing her remarks within the broader context of women’s safety and moral values.
Public Reaction
Patel’s statements have drawn widespread attention and criticism, with many questioning the language and approach used to discuss live-in relationships. Critics argue that framing the issue in such extreme terms may stigmatize women rather than promote informed decision-making.




Comments